home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools.misc
- Path: uucp-1.csn.net!slimer!bgeerdes
- From: bgeerdes@igs.com (Bruce Geerdes)
- Subject: Re: C++ with Zapp vs. Delphi
- Message-ID: <1996Jan9.153110.1288@igs.com>
- Followup-To: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools.misc
- Organization: Igs, Inc.
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
- References: <4cfor8$qno@picasso.op.net> <4cjthe$23t@canton.charm.net> <4csdo8$308@news.iconn.net> <4csugm$slr@wolfe.wimsey.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 96 15:31:10 GMT
-
- Craig Johannsen (johan@wimsey.com) wrote:
- > Because it is more simple, I think a developer can get up to speed
- > more quickly with Delphi. The versions of zApp I worked with didn't
- > have any database classes (like TTable or TQuery), so if you want
- > to build database applications, Delphi seems the more logical choice.
-
- Inmark has merged with Rogue Wave (which makes tools.h++ and dbtools.h++), so
- future versions of zApp should have database classes available to them.
- --
- bgeerdes@igs.com (Bruce Geerdes)
-